This article I wrote appeared on the Newsmax.com web site on Thursday, April 1, 2021.
Survey Shows US Catholics’ Growing Concern About Global Persecution of Christians – By George J. Marlin
Posted April 1, 2021 by streetcornerconservativeCategories: Articles/Essays/Op-Ed
Curran balances two Nassau budgets – By George J. Marlin
Posted March 24, 2021 by streetcornerconservativeCategories: Articles/Essays/Op-Ed
The following appeared on Monday, March 22, 2021 on The Island Now’s website
When serving as county executive, the convicted felon Ed Mangano failed to grasp the precepts of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles as it pertains to balancing Nassau’s operating budget.
Discovering his disinterest in learning the ABC’s of GAAP during my tenure as a director of the Nassau Interim Finance Authority, I was not surprised. After all, Mangano’s Republican predecessor, Tom Gulotta, drove the county to the brink of bankruptcy in the 1990s with his reckless spending and chronically unbalanced books—resulting in the very need for NIFA’s existence.
Like Gulotta, Mangano foolishly thought one can balance a budget by borrowing money to fill in the deficit hole.
This approach, however, is a violation of the fundamental principle taught to every student in Accounting 101: Borrowed money is not revenue.
Why? Borrowing only kicks the fiscal can down the road. It is like drawing down your VISA card line of credit to cover your mortgage payment. You are still in debt for the amount of the mortgage. And if you continue this practice, eventually you go broke.
Mangano was back on the road to fiscal perdition when NIFA declared a control period in 2011 and began to guide the Mangano administration toward achieving a GAAP-balanced budget.
Mangano fought NIFA tooth and nail, and when he left office in disgrace, the county’s operating budget was still structurally unbalanced.
When Democrat Laura Curran took office in January 2015, she inherited a fiscal mess and had to continue running deficits.
But, working with NIFA, and thanks to a strong economy, Nassau’s operating deficits on a GAAP basis began to significantly decline.
Since Curran has taken office, the deficit declined to $61.2 million in 2018 and in 2019 the county incurred for the first time in years a GAAP operating surplus of $76.8 million.
However, that major achievement, appeared to be in jeopardy due to the onset of the Coronavirus pandemic in March 2020.
In its August 2020 review of the county’s multi-year fiscal plan, NIFA painted this dreary picture: “Nassau County had been making progress toward resolving its fiscal problems before the onset of COVID-19 pandemic…. An examination of the county’s finances shows that the COVID-19 pandemic causes … financial problems. The threats manifest in projected risks that if not addressed could result in deficits of approximately $334.2 million in FY 2020 and $481.4 million in FY 2021.”
The good news for county residents is that the fiscal picture changed dramatically by December 2020, and it looks like when the books are audited, there will be a GAAP budget surplus for 2020 between $45 and $75 million.
While total income is projected to be $3.239 billion, down $320.7 million from the 2020 modified budget, total expenses are projected to come in at $3.164 billion, a decrease of $395.7 million.
The biggest savings, $152 million, were in salaries and fringes from vacancies, health insurance costs, and offsets to costs paid for by CARES Act funding.
Curran effectively managed the payroll and proved, that the county government could deliver services with less people—even in an emergency.
Granted, the federal COVID aid received in 2020, and the debt service savings are one-shot revenues. Nevertheless, incurring any GAAP surplus in 2020 is a major victory and a far cry from the projected GAAP deficit of $334.2 million.
With the economy bouncing back in 2021, Curran will have the opportunity to continue restoring financial stability to the county, particularly if she does not surrender to the municipal unions in an election year and continues to manage the employee headcount effectively.
One suggestion for the county executive to ponder: Since the $300 million from the 2021 federal COVID Relief Act the county will receive is a one-shot revenue, how about using that money to settle the $300 million in Tax Certiorari claims? In 2020, the county was able to balance the budget with far less in COVID relief due to the loophole which sent over $100 million to the Town of Hempstead rather than the county. This year the county is receiving the full amount, which can result in a windfall considering that it wasn’t contemplated in the adopted 2021 budget in nearly that amount.
Using the money to settle old claims would eliminate the need to burden taxpayers with more long-term debt, and could bring an end to the need for extending the NIFA control period any further than necessary due to the outstanding uncertainty. The county executive could, in that way, add a third balanced budget to her record and put the county’s elected officials in the position of being able to determine their own fiscal fate for the first time in a decade.
That’s what I call a genuine twofer. Think about it, Mrs. Curran.
Nothing ‘Imaginary’ About Antifa’s Legacy of Real Violence – By George J. Marlin
Posted March 18, 2021 by streetcornerconservativeCategories: Articles/Essays/Op-Ed, Newsmax
This article I wrote appeared on the Newsmax.com web site on Thursday, March 18, 2021.
Can Republican Congressman Lee Zeldin Beat Governor Andrew Cuomo in 2022? – By George J. Marlin
Posted March 2, 2021 by streetcornerconservativeCategories: Andrew Cuomo, Articles/Essays/Op-Ed
This article I wrote appeared on the Newsmax.com web site on Tuesday, March 2, 2021.
Cuomo reminds us like father, like son – By George J. Marlin
Posted February 22, 2021 by streetcornerconservativeCategories: Andrew Cuomo, Articles/Essays/Op-Ed, Blank Slate Media
The following appeared on Monday, February 22, 2021 on The Island Now’s website:
With the nursing home scandal roiling the Cuomo administration, it appears the governor’s management style—stonewalling, trusting no one, being secretive, instilling fear in his senior staff, badgering journalists and public officials—has finally caught up with him.
Why has Andrew Cuomo’s governing style approach been so heavy-handed?
Because he is his father’s son.
To understand Andrew, you must understand the man whose footsteps he followed, Gov. Mario Cuomo.
Outside of his family, Mario Cuomo trusted no one. When the journalist Jimmy Breslin, was asked about the governor’s inner circle, he replied: “There’s not enough people to form a circle.”
Similarly, Andrew only trusted Joe Percoco, the man he referred to in his father’s eulogy as Mario’s “third son.” But with Percoco doing time in a federal prison, there has not been anyone who could say to Andrew “No, that’s a stupid idea.” Instead he’s surrounded by sycophants that say “aye, aye, sir” to every ludicrous command.
Mario Cuomo was secretive. Although he claimed his government was transparent, reporters had a hard time prying information out of the administration.
Ditto Andrew Cuomo. The Empire Center for Public Policy had to sue the governor to obtain the true number of COVID nursing home deaths.
When dealing with the press, Mario insisted on being the principal spokesman for his administration. But he distained them. “Reporters,” he said, “are like epidemics. They follow catastrophes.” Another time, the New York Times reported that Mario said “he is adept at talking to schoolchildren…because he deals with them the same way he does with reporters.” He added, “Only the children get it right.”
Watching Andrew’s daily press conferences during the pandemic, it was obvious to me that Andrew had little regard for journalists and treated them like kindergarteners.
Andrew also adopted Mario’s practice of badgering and threatening journalists and public officials.
Mario Cuomo could be verbally brutal with those who disagreed with him. He was known to call reporters or editors at their homes late at night or very early in the morning to complain about their stories. The Times reported that “the governor has berated writers, accused them of doing the bidding of editorial boards and attacked their ethics.”
On one occasion, Mario threatened Times reporter Jeffrey Schmaltz. “I could end your career,” he said. “Your publisher doesn’t even know who you are.”
On another occasion, the noted Times journalist, Adam Nagourney (then the Daily News Albany bureau chief), had an “intense, at times unpleasant” argument with Cuomo, during which the governor said, “I could destroy you if I wanted.”
Andrew Cuomo is also well-known for threatening perceived enemies. A recent example is the call he made to Queens Assemblyman Ron Kim about the nursing home scandal. Kim alleges that Cuomo yelled at him for 10 minutes and threatened to destroy his political career.
Yes, the paranoid governing style of Mario and Andrew is remarkably similar. Nevertheless, there is one major difference between them which may help explain why Mario left public office with honor and why Andrew may not.
Mario Cuomo’s political model was St. Thomas More, the patron saint of lawyers, statesmen and politicians, because he was, in Cuomo’s judgment, a combination of “noble hopes and goals and personal weakness.”
And while Andrew displays in Albany the copy of the Holbein portrait of More that hung in Mario’s office throughout his tenure as governor, Andrew’s political model is a man Thomas More abhorred, Niccolò Machiavelli.
In an essay titled “How a leader’s philosophy directly affects an organization culture,” Peter DeMarco, a former U.S. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development employee, wrote: “One of Cuomo’s first acts after taking over as secretary of HUD in 1997 was to distribute the book by Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince, to his key aides telling them: ‘This is my leadership philosophy.’”
Machiavelli is the man the renowned 20th century political philosopher, Leo Strauss, called “a teacher of evil” because he stooped “to teach maxims of public and private gangsterism.”
Machiavelli’s best-known maxim is “the ends justify the means.” And if Andrew employed that “gangster” precept to rationalize the nursing home cover-up, he will be guilty of licentious conduct, will dishonor his family name and will go down in the annals of New York history as a political blackguard.