Archive for the ‘Political Issues’ category

Can Harris Beat Trump? – By George J. Marlin

September 2, 2024

The following appeared on Monday, September 2, 2024, in the Blank Slate Media newspaper chain and on its website, theisland360.com:

The Democratic National Convention, which was more hype than substance, attempted to portray its nominee, Kamala Harris, as a joyful challenger rather than an incumbent. Harris was scripted to come across as the candidate of change and the working class.

As for Harris’s incumbent colleague, President Joe Biden, he was permitted to speak outside of the primetime period. Immediately afterwards, his party banished him to the dust bowl of history.

In her acceptance speech, Harris presented herself to the nation as a nonideological centrist who would be tough on crime, tackle the inflation problem, and control the border by—get this—building a wall.

Apparently, the Democrats are hoping voters do not hold Harris accountable for the Biden-Harris agenda. They hope to shove the past three and a half years down the Orwellian “memory hole.”

Democrats hope the election will not be a referendum on the Biden-Harris record, but a choice election based on personalities.

Yet, despite all the convention’s hocus-pocus, I don’t believe the voters will give Harris a pass and excuse the last three and a half years.

Let’s face it: the vice president stood next to Biden at every public policy announcement. The president constantly referred to the Biden-Harris Administration.

Harris boasted she was the last person in the room when Biden made important decisions—including the one that led to the botched Afghanistan withdrawal.

Harris has been the leading cheerleader for the Biden Administration and the defender of its economic and spending policies, which led to rapid inflation.

She has often proclaimed that “Bidenomics” has been working and has also stated, time and again, that the president was mentally in top form.

Let’s not forget her claim that the southern border is secure. Considering there have been 8.3 million border encounters since Biden and Harris took office, versus 2.4 million under Trump, that’s a tough one to swallow.

As for being a moderate, Harris’s public record contradicts that claim. As a US Senator and candidate for president in 2020:

  • Harris supported the elimination of private health insurance.
  • Harris sponsored the radical multi-trillion-dollar Green New Deal legislation.
  • Harris opposed the building of the border wall, calling it Trump’s “medieval vanity project.”
  • Harris supported a ban on fracking.
  • Harris supported the California referendum that reduced penalties for shoplifting. (Stealing under $900 is okay in California.)
  • Harris called for the defunding of police departments.
  • Harris stated it should not be a crime to enter the US illegally.
  • Harris supports the Biden plan to destroy the Supreme Court’s independence.
  • Harris supports the elimination of the US Senate filibuster.

Harris is trying to backtrack on some of those policy positions and trying to hide the fact that she is a San Francisco radical who was rated the most left-wing member of the Senate in 2020. (Yes, she was more extreme than Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.)

But will voters buy the new and improved Harris?

Here’s why I don’t think so.

Four years ago, Joe Biden, who had a 50-year record as a liberal moderate, promised the American people he would govern as a centrist.

However, after assuming office, he immediately moved to the far left to appease the AOC wing of the Democratic Party. Unlike Biden, Harris has been a lifelong leftist. And I don’t believe the American public is naive enough to buy her sudden road to Damascus conversion to moderation. They will see it for what it is—a smoke screen to get her through the election.

As for Donald Trump—he can beat Harris if he holds her accountable for the failed domestic and global policies of the Biden-Harris Administration and articulates his vision for another term in office.

If Trump hopes to win, he must—in Michelle Obama’s words—“go high when they go low.”

But, if he snaps at the Democratic Party’s bait and focuses on personalities and name-calling, he will surely lose in November.

Is Tim Walz a Useful Pawn for China? – By George J. Marlin

August 26, 2024

This article I wrote appeared on the Newsmax.com website on Monday, August 26, 2024.

Democratic Party Drops FDR, JFK for a Freak Show – By George J. Marlin

August 13, 2024

This article I wrote appeared on the Newsmax.com website on Tuesday, August 13, 2024.

My Take on the National Democrats – By George J. Marlin

August 6, 2024

The following appeared on Monday, August 5, 2024, in the Blank Slate Media newspaper chain and on its website, theisland360.com:

When President Joe Biden was beating Donald Trump in public opinion polls, leading Democrats, including Sen. Chuck Schumer, House Leader Hakeem Jeffries, and Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi, were saying ad nauseam that Biden was in top form, alert, engaged, on the ball and clear-sighted.

Biden’s press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, when asked about the president’s mental acuity, said, “He is as sharp as ever as I have known him to be in any engagement, in my experience with him. And I know when I walk into the Oval Office or see him on Air Force One, I have to be on top of my game.”

The “party line” throughout the 2024 primary season: Biden’s in tip-top shape. And any public figure who dared to disagree was demonized as a purveyor of disinformation.

Even though most Americans suspected that Biden’s mental acuity was declining, Democrats did not mind denying it was true so long as they thought Biden could win.

However, when battle ground state polls started trending towards Trump after Biden’s awful debate performance on June 28, the Democratic establishment turned on the president.

Throughout July, the pressure began to build on Biden to withdraw even though 14 million Democrats voted for him in the primaries and 99% of the delegates to the Democratic Convention were pledged to him.

When Biden wouldn’t budge and said only the “Almighty” could get him out of the race, the Democrats’ secular “Almighty,” Barack Obama, decided to save the nation from Joe Biden.

Obama’s behind-the-scenes coup succeeded. In an Oval Office speech on Sunday, July 24, Biden told the American people he was withdrawing from the 2024 presidential race.

While not giving a reason for dropping out, Biden said he was passing the torch to a new generation to save democracy and reminded listeners we were a republic not a monarchy.

Afterwards, Biden stuck it to Obama and his coup collaborators by endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris to succeed him.

Harris was not the first choice of Democratic Party power brokers. They considered her a lightweight whose low 30s approval ratings were worse than Biden’s.

Throughout her term in office, Harris struggled in news interviews. Unable to talk substantively about major issues, she tangled up words, spoke in non sequiturs and tautologies, and in awkward moments, would burst out laughing no matter what the topic.

Thanks to Biden, however, there was a sudden rush of support for Harris and the skeptical Democratic Establishment had no choice but to jump on her bandwagon.

Harris is the nominee although she never received one vote from the party’s rank-and-file. (So much for the democratic process Biden lauded.)

Harris has been crowned—just like unelected potentates in despotic regimes. (Maybe Biden was wrong about the U.S.A. not having monarchs.)

Choosing Harris without a competitive process, New York Times columnist Bret Stevens has pointed out, “is a recipe for disaster.”

“The whole point of a competitive process,” Stevens noted, “is to discover unsuspected strengths and to test for hidden weaknesses, which is how Harris flamed out as a candidate the last time before ever reaching the Iowa caucus. If there’s evidence that she’s a better candidate now than she was then, she should be given the chance to prove it.”

Despite media adulation and well-scripted campaign appearances, there remains a laundry list of Harris’s weaknesses. Stevens sums them up thusly: she’s unpopular; she’s been a bad campaigner; she’s been a bad manager; she has a penchant for excruciating banality; she’s a blue-state Democrat who needs to win purple states; she’s anchored to Joe Biden’s record; and her career smacks of connections and favoritism.

I couldn’t say it better myself.

All of this is good news for Republicans. But Trump being Trump can blow it if he bases his campaign on name-calling and not on the issues that matter most to Americans: inflation, high cost of living, crime, border safety, and federal budget deficits.

Trump Heir to Jacksonian Populism – George J. Marlin

July 30, 2024

This article I wrote appeared on the Newsmax.com website on Tuesday, July 30, 2024.