Statement by

George J. Marlin

Director

Nassau Interim Finance Authority

October 6, 2011

           At the September 28, 2010 board meeting—over a year ago now—NIFA announced that after a preliminary review of the County’s proposed 2011 budget, “given the level of risks in the County’s Multi-Year Financial Plan as presented, we do not believe the Plan, and its FY 2011 Budget, meets the standards of prudence necessary for us to project budget balance at this time.”  The County promptly disagreed with that assessment, insisting its budget was balanced.

           On December 16, 2010 five days before the December 21 NIFA Board Meeting, the County Executive ordered $23 million in additional cuts and said, “The 2011 budget was balanced before these new spending cuts.  These new budget cuts are designed to strengthen the County’s fiscal situation even further.”  On December 20, 2011, the County Executive reiterated, “Nassau’s 2011 budget is balanced and maintains significant contingencies.”  On December 22, 2011, Newsday reported that County CFO Timothy Sullivan said in a statement, “There is no deficit.”

           Prior to NIFA’s December 30, 2010 meeting in a letter dated December 28, 2010 to Chairman Stack, the County Executive wrote:  “Just two months ago the County Legislature adopted a balanced budget for 2011 that closes a $343 million deficit while not increasing property taxes.”

           In the January 26, 2011 edition of The Wall Street Journal, the day NIFA assumed control of County finances citing a budget imbalance of $176 million, reporter Sumathi Reddy wrote, “Mr. Mangano insists the budget is balanced and has said NIFA is requiring him to come up with unnecessary contingency plans.”

           On February 10, 2011, The Long Island Press, reported that in an interview the County Executive said “I put forth a budget that is definitely balanced.”

           In the August 5, 2011 edition of the News Times Newspaper, Timothy Meyer reported, “Deputy County Executive of Finance Tim Sullivan told the Nassau County legislature Monday that the county will have a balanced budget in 2011, and if the Nassau County Interim Finance Authority continues to say otherwise, the state oversight authority should tell the county how to bring it into balance.  ‘We’ve given them every possible revised plan we can think of,’ Sullivan said.  ‘I know the budget is balanced when a big four audit company signs off on it.’”

           As late as August 1, 2011, the County was still maintaining that its 2011 budget was balanced.  Just days later, however, the Nassau County Comptroller estimated a $134 million budget shortfall; the Nassau Legislative Budget Office put the deficit at $118 million and NIFA’s revised projection for the 2011 budget deficit is $153 million.

           As Nassau’s fiscal condition continues to deteriorate, the County appears to be in denial.  For instance, the County wants to spend $20 million to improve its baseball fields, making the dubious claim there will be additional usage fees from little league and other amateur teams to cover the $1 million a year in debt service.  I ask, is it a wise expenditure of scarce funds during a fiscal crisis?

           The County announced a hiring freeze on December 17, 2010, an appropriate action.  But the hiring freeze thawed and additional County workers were hired even though other County workers were being laid off.

           On September 16, 2011, the County proposed a budget that assumes legislation will be approved that permits municipal employee contracts to be abrogated.  Is it probable that such legislation will be passed or survive court challenges?

           As for the 2012 budget; instead of designing an achievable “shared sacrifice” plan, the County proposed another high-risk budget that merely gives the illusion of being balanced.  NIFA estimates those risks at approximately $280 million.  2011 redux?

           Back in 1975, the financial markets closed their doors to New York City.  Years of balancing budgets with “blue smoke and mirror” gimmicks and a “borrow now, pay later” mentality caught up with elected officials.  To institute an orderly and controlled process for placing the City on a sound financial footing, then-Mayor Abraham Beame had to eliminate 47,412 jobs (20 percent of the total) between January 1, 1975 and May 31, 1976.  By means of attrition, retirements, resignations and layoffs, 20 percent of New York City’s teachers, 14 percent of the police, 14 percent of firefighters, 33 percent of sanitation and 25 percent of Parks Department positions were eliminated.  Scores of programs and departments were reduced or abolished.  Capital project spending came to a halt.  The City had no alternative but to heal itself because state coffers were empty.

           Assessing the dire fiscal conditions of New York State, the City and the Urban Development Corporation, the newly sworn-in governor, Hugh L. Carey, valiantly announced in 1975 “The days of wine and roses are over.”

           The time has come for the County to face reality and declare the days of minor league baseball parks, barbeques and coliseums are over.  The time has come for the County to face its responsibilities, dispense with fiscal shell games and take the necessary corrective actions to restore fiscal integrity.  It will not be easy or pleasant.  It will mean making difficult decisions.  Such is the price of holding an executive office.

           I also urge elected officials of every political party, good government advocates, journalists and reporters to remove their heads out of the sand, look beyond County press releases, and alert and educate the public to the magnitude of this crisis.

           All should promote public discourse as to whether it is wise policy to sell off the County’s assets and use the proceeds as “one shots” to balance the operating budget.  The public should be made aware that one-shots will not fix the County’s structural deficit.  It is only “kicking the fiscal can” down Old Country Road.

           There should be public discussion as to whether the proposed sale of Nassau’s sewer system is good public policy.  The public should be told how much more it will cost to flush their toilets if there is a sale.  There will be a flush fee (a/k/a tax) because sewage costs will no longer be based on property tax assessments and because the buyers of the sewer system will require a profit on their investment.

           NIFA has been sounding the fiscal crisis alarm; for the sake of the County’s taxpayers, it can no longer fall on deaf ears.  Officials can no longer be spectators in their own government.  As Abraham Lincoln said:  “…let us stand by our duty fearlessly and effectively…. Neither let us be slandered from our duty by false accusations against us, nor frightened from it by menaces of destruction to the Government…. Let us have faith that right makes might, and in that faith let us, to the end, dare to do our duty as we understand it.”

This entry was posted on October 6, 2011 at 5:02 pm and is filed under Articles/Essays/Op-Ed. You can subscribe via RSS 2.0 feed to this post's comments. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.